Keywords
alliance governance, trustworthiness, relationship management capabilities
Abstract
This paper offers a model of alliance governance that explicitly recognizes that managers of alliances simultaneously face the objectives of maximizing gains from trade while minimizing the threat of opportunism in the transaction—an apparent paradox. Our model shows that both the gains from trade and the threat of opportunism are influenced by firm characteristics (cooperative capabilities and trustworthiness) as well as transaction attributes (information asymmetry and asset specificity). The paradox may be resolved by strong form trustworthiness combined with relationship management capabilities because these characteristics allow the pursuit of gains from trade while simultaneously limiting the threat of opportunism.
Original Publication Citation
Hansen, M.H., Hoskisson, R.E., & Barney, J.B. (2008). Competitive Advantage in Alliance Governance: Resolving the Opportunism Minimization-Gain Maximization Paradox. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 191-208.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Hansen, Mark H.; Hoskisson, Robert E.; and Barney, Jay B., "Competitive Advantage in Alliance Governance: Resolving the Opportunism Minimization–Gain Maximization Paradox" (2008). Faculty Publications. 9787.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/9787
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2008
Publisher
Managerial and Decision Economics
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Status
© 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/