Multidimensional Versus Unidimensional Measures in Assessing National Culture Values: The Hofstede VSM 94 Example
Keywords
national culture, measurement
Abstract
Recent attention in the national culture literature has been given to the question of applying sociological, group-level measures to psychological, individual-level phenomenon. The current study addresses this measurement issue by examining the most widely used measures of national culture values: those developed by Hofstede and his colleagues using the Value Survey Module (VSM) and an updated version, the VSM 94. Hofstede's country-level index scores are applied by some researchers on an individual level, which was never the intended use of the indices. In doing so, the unidimensional aspects of these indices fail to represent the multidimensional nature of an individual's cultural values. The current research involved two large studies, including data collected from over 1400 subjects in four countries. Analysis of the validity of the VSM 94 measures reveals a number of shortcomings. Our findings demonstrate the unsuitability of using measures designed for unidimensional constructs to represent multidimensional, individual-level traits.
Original Publication Citation
Bearden, William O., R. Bruce Money, and Jennifer L. Nevins (2006), “Multidimensional Versus Unidimensional Measures in Assessing National Culture Values: The Hofstede VSM Example,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (2), 195-203.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Bearden, William O.; Money, Bruce; and Nevins, Jennifer L., "Multidimensional Versus Unidimensional Measures in Assessing National Culture Values: The Hofstede VSM 94 Example" (2006). Faculty Publications. 8622.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8622
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2006
Publisher
Journal of Business Research
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/