Keywords
design science, artifacts, recommendations, practice relevance
Abstract
Design Science Research (DSR) is a rigorous research methodology widely used in other fields like computer science and engineering, but its application in accounting is still relatively limited. This paper reviews the implementation of DSR published in accounting journals and provides recommendations to improve the authoring and reviewing processes. We review 51 DSR articles published in accounting journals between 2011 and 2023. The analysis identified areas where papers excelled and fell short, leading to recommendations in the following key aspects: adherence to a research framework, validation of research questions, defining objectives of artifacts, developing a more diverse set of artifacts, evaluation of artifacts, and presenting results effectively. By following these recommendations, authors and reviewers can enhance the quality and impact of DSR research in accounting and increase its publication in prestigious journals.
Original Publication Citation
Myers, Noah and Snow, Mason C. and Waddoups, Nathan and Wood, David A., Improving the Production and Reviewing of Design Science Research in Accounting (May 9, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4823240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4823240
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Myers, Noah; Snow, Mason; Waddoups, Nathan; and Wood, David A., "Improving the Production and Reviewing of Design Science Research in Accounting" (2024). Faculty Publications. 8316.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8316
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2024
Publisher
SSRN
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Accountancy
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/