Keywords

differential diagnosis, specific language impairment, developmental language disorders, ADHD, behavioral rating scales, reliability and validity

Abstract

Seventeen years ago, Redmond 1 reviewed five standardized behavioral rating scales and identified several aspects of their design that made them prone to mischaracterize language impairments as socioemotional behavioral disorders. The purpose of this report is to provide an update and extension of the original audit. We consulted test manuals to evaluate: (1) representation of children with language impairments in their standardization samples; (2) presence of language, or academic items within their inventories; (3) accommodations for administering the measure to children with language impairments; and (4) procedures for identifying inordinately punitive ratings. Overlapping language and academic symptoms continued to be a problem across current behavioral rating scales. Improvements since Redmond 1 occurred in the representation of children with language impairments in standardization samples and in procedures for identifying inordinately punitive ratings. We discuss implications for clinical assessment, research programs, and instrument development.

Original Publication Citation

Redmond, S. M., Hannig, K. & Wilder, A. (2019). Redmond (2002) revisited: Have standardized behavioral rating scales gotten better at accommodating for overlapping symptoms with language impairment? Seminars in Speech and Language, 40, 272-290. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692963

Document Type

Peer-Reviewed Article

Publication Date

2019

Publisher

Seminars in Speech and Language

Language

English

College

David O. McKay School of Education

Department

Communication Disorders

University Standing at Time of Publication

Assistant Professor

Share

COinS