Keywords
Stakeholders, Community Based Participatory Communication, Engagement
Location
Session F3: Modeling with Stakeholders: Old Problems, New Solutions
Start Date
17-6-2014 10:40 AM
End Date
17-6-2014 12:00 PM
Abstract
The management of public natural resources can be challenging, especially in the face of diverse stakeholders with varied interests and concerns. In most cases, decision-makers lack sufficient data from which to assess the range, intensity, and convergence of community preferences. Traditional attempts to acquire such information from public meetings frequently are constrained by a format that too often permits a few individuals to monopolize or co-opt sessions for their own purposes or agendas. Such experiences in past public meetings subsequently drive community expectations for future meetings, frequently resulting in decreased attendance and a less representative participant base. Consequently, regulators or decision-makers can come to view public meetings as a regulatory obligation of high contentiousness and little utility that must be endured, while other community stakeholders adopt a cynical perspective that assumes final decisions already have been pre-determined.
To help address these challenges, researchers at the University of Kentucky have developed an eight- step, multi-directional stakeholder engagement methodology that involves stakeholders at the very beginning of the decision process. The methodology incorporates both qualitative and quantitative methods drawing on principles from Community-Based Participatory Communication (CBPC) and Structured Public Involvement (SPI). CBPC uses interviews, focus groups, and projective techniques to identify varied community groups and to discover the value systems, risk perceptions, and preferences among these groups. SPI employs anonymous Audience Response Systems (ARS) in large-scale public meetings to identify democratic solutions to complex issues while resisting co-optation of the process by a single interest group.
This paper describes the application of the methodology to a case study identifying acceptable nutrient management strategies for a watershed near Louisville, Kentucky. The paper will elucidate key insights derived from the application of the methodology, as well as make recommendations for application of the methodology to other problems involving stakeholder input into public decisions.
Included in
Civil Engineering Commons, Data Storage Systems Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Hydraulic Engineering Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons
Stakeholder Engagement in Public Natural Resource Management
Session F3: Modeling with Stakeholders: Old Problems, New Solutions
The management of public natural resources can be challenging, especially in the face of diverse stakeholders with varied interests and concerns. In most cases, decision-makers lack sufficient data from which to assess the range, intensity, and convergence of community preferences. Traditional attempts to acquire such information from public meetings frequently are constrained by a format that too often permits a few individuals to monopolize or co-opt sessions for their own purposes or agendas. Such experiences in past public meetings subsequently drive community expectations for future meetings, frequently resulting in decreased attendance and a less representative participant base. Consequently, regulators or decision-makers can come to view public meetings as a regulatory obligation of high contentiousness and little utility that must be endured, while other community stakeholders adopt a cynical perspective that assumes final decisions already have been pre-determined.
To help address these challenges, researchers at the University of Kentucky have developed an eight- step, multi-directional stakeholder engagement methodology that involves stakeholders at the very beginning of the decision process. The methodology incorporates both qualitative and quantitative methods drawing on principles from Community-Based Participatory Communication (CBPC) and Structured Public Involvement (SPI). CBPC uses interviews, focus groups, and projective techniques to identify varied community groups and to discover the value systems, risk perceptions, and preferences among these groups. SPI employs anonymous Audience Response Systems (ARS) in large-scale public meetings to identify democratic solutions to complex issues while resisting co-optation of the process by a single interest group.
This paper describes the application of the methodology to a case study identifying acceptable nutrient management strategies for a watershed near Louisville, Kentucky. The paper will elucidate key insights derived from the application of the methodology, as well as make recommendations for application of the methodology to other problems involving stakeholder input into public decisions.
