Keywords
MARC, XML, Bibliographic information, Cataloging, Indexing
Abstract
Some of the issues in discussion between MARC and XML deal with the desire to expand the content of the bibliographic record. An often-cited example is the library that wishes to enrich the current electronic record with a table of contents. Although a table of contents inclusion is actually possible with the MARC record, it is certainly not an ideal platform for such content. The MARC record is described as being a "flat" record, meaning it does not have a hierarchal nature. As such, it is a poor candidate for hierarchal structures such as a table of contents. A discussion of strengths and weaknesses and perceived risk of XML adoption is given.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Zuber, Peter A., "MARC vs XML" (2005). Faculty Publications. 998.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/998
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2005-12-20
Permanent URL
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/1431
Language
English
College
Harold B. Lee Library
Copyright Status
© 2005 Peter Zuber
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/