Review of Delacroix, Art and Patrimony in Post-Revolutionary France by Elisabeth A. Fraser

Keywords

artistic lineage, political legitimacy, Restoration France, history painting, cultural inheritance

Abstract

In her excellent book, Delacroix, Art and Patrimony in Post-Revolutionary France, Elisabeth A. Fraser joins the ranks of scholars attending to the complex relationships between history and painting in the early nineteenth century.[1] This text frames Eugène Delacroix’s early work in terms of the family metaphor, a conceit which is used to articulate how these paintings were bound up intimately in issues of inheritance, lineage, and authority. Because one of the defining characteristics of the artist’s development and of Restoration culture was this anxiety over legitimacy, the author contends, this concern saturated his output during the 1820s, as manifest in works such as his Dante and Virgil, Massacres at Chios, and Death of Sardanapalus. Moving from Delacroix’s personal quest to establish an appropriate artistic genealogy to the nation’s concern over rightful political authority, Fraser builds a convincing case for the significance of patrimonial issues in the formation and reception of Delacroix’s early history paintings.

Original Publication Citation

Review of Delacroix, Art and Patrimony in Post-Revolutionary France by Elisabeth A. Fraser (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004). For H-France, online reviews for the Society of French Historical Studies, vol.4, issue 11 (November 2004).

Document Type

Other

Publication Date

2004

Publisher

H-France, online reviews for the Society of French Historical Studies

Language

English

College

Humanities

Department

Art History

University Standing at Time of Publication

Full Professor

Share

COinS