Keywords
asynchronous online learning, peer evaluation, student engagement
Abstract
In traditional face-to-face classes, conventional wisdom suggests that delivering and watching group project presentations is a valuable learning experience. In this research, we examine the limits of student engagement and learning in an asynchronous online context. Specifically, 249 undergraduate students were assigned to perform peer evaluations of multiple ten-minute project presentations. The online learning platform collected objective viewing behavior for each student, allowing us to use viewing time as a proxy for engagement. We also collected self-reported attitudes towards the assignment, finding that while students value providing feedback, they do not consider it a valuable use of their time. Students who engage more are also likely to receive a better final course grade. Finally, students exhibit different types of viewing behavior (i.e., personas) when evaluating multiple videos. Based on these results, we provide suggestions for improving the design of online group presentation and peer-review assignments.
Original Publication Citation
Kumar, M., Valacich, J. S., Jenkins, J. L., Kim, D. (2022) “When is enough, enough? An Examination of Student Engagement when Watching Online Group Project Presentations” Hawaii International Conference on Computer and Systems Sciences. Hawaii, January 4-7.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Kumar, Manasvi; Valacich, Joseph S.; Jenkins, Jeffrey L.; and Kim, David, "When is Enough, Enough? An Examination of Student Engagement when Watching Online Group Project Presentations" (2022). Faculty Publications. 9454.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/9454
Document Type
Conference Paper
Publication Date
2022
Publisher
Hawaii International Conference on Computer and Systems Sciences
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Information Systems Management
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/