Psychological Reactance to Leader Moral Hypocrisy
Keywords
leader moral hypocrisy, psychological reactance, ethical leadership, workplace deviance
Abstract
Drawing on early work on ethical leadership, we argue that when leaders engage in leader moral hypocrisy (i.e., ethical promotion without ethical demonstration), followers can experience psychological reactance—a negative response to a perceived restriction of freedom—which can have negative downstream consequences. In a survey of employee–manager dyads (study 1), we demonstrate that leader moral hypocrisy is positively associated with follower psychological reactance, which increases follower deviance. In two subsequent laboratory experiments, we find similar patterns of results (study 2) and explore potential alternative mechanisms (study 3). We demonstrate in a final experiment with working adults that the relationship between leader moral hypocrisy and psychological reactance is partly explained by increased perceptions of a leader’s use of power (study 4). We discuss the implications of our findings and advocate for further understanding of the risks associated with psychological reactance in response to leaders and other workplace situations.
Original Publication Citation
"Rees, M., Smith. I. H., & Soderberg, A. T. (forthcoming). Psychological reactance to leader moral hypocrisy. Business Ethics Quarterly.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Rees, McKenzie R.; Smith, Isaac; and Soderberg, Andrew T., "Psychological Reactance to Leader Moral Hypocrisy" (2023). Faculty Publications. 9310.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/9310
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2023
Publisher
Business Ethics Quarterly
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/