Keywords
private firm exits, IPO versus M&A, risk-adjusted premiums
Abstract
Changing disclosure requirements and the evolution of US markets in the 21st century have created historic shifts in the exit strategies and payoffs for private firms. The propensity to sell to an acquirer has dominated firm exits in recent decades, especially for smaller private firms in highly concentrated industries. Exceptions to the merger exit preference are venture capital‐backed firms, which exhibit an enduring preference for IPOs, likely due to the reputation effects associated with this strategy. While the premium for IPO exits has exceeded that for M&A exits in the past, we document a reversal in this pricing trend: in more recent years firms that sell out earn higher risk‐adjusted premiums than firms that conduct IPOs. Our empirical tests examine potential drivers of this effect. We believe we are the first to document this reversal in the economics of the exit decision.
Original Publication Citation
The Impact of Changing Disclosure Requirements, Competition, and Private Capital on Firm Exit Methods and Premiums, with Ninon Sutton and Qian Zheng, Journal of Financial Research.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Brau, James C.; Sutton, Ninon K.; and Zheng, Qiancheng, "The Impact of Changing Disclosure Requirements, Competition, and Private Capital on Firm Exit Methods and Premiums" (2024). Faculty Publications. 9153.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/9153
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2024
Publisher
Journal of Financial Research
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Finance
Copyright Status
© 2024 The Southern Finance Association and the Southwestern Finance Association
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/