Substantive Implementation with Symbolic Silence: The Strategic Publication of Certification Status
Keywords
institutional theory, certification, decoupling, impression management, prosocial claims, greenwash, sustainability
Abstract
In this article, we examine why organizations may at times substantively implement a practice, but choose not to symbolically signal such implementation. Central to our theory is the notion that concerns about being perceived as a hypocrite may cause organizations to remain symbolically silent about their organizational activities. Using a longitudinal panel of corporations that obtained a prominent environmental certification, we show that organizations are less likely to publicize their certification status when recent organizational activities directly contradict the claims implied by the certification and when such contradictions are readily apparent and understood. These findings contribute to the organizational literature by introducing a more nuanced form of decoupling and exploring an overlooked distinction between obtaining and publicizing certifications. They also help to delineate new boundary conditions under which firms will make prosocial claims and provide insights into how corporations strategically communicate with external constituents about their sustainability initiatives.
Original Publication Citation
Academy of Management Meetings. “Substantive implementation with symbolic silence: The strategic publication of certification status.” Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 11, 2015.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Carlos, W. Chad and Lewis, Ben W., "Substantive Implementation with Symbolic Silence: The Strategic Publication of Certification Status" (2015). Faculty Publications. 8998.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8998
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2015
Publisher
Academy of Management Meetings
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/