Collective Estimation: Accuracy, Expertise, and Extroversion as Sources of Intra-Group Influence
Keywords
group decision-making, social decision schemes, intra-group influence, social permutation
Abstract
Although estimations typically possess correct answers, these answers may be difficult to demonstrate to others. However, providing external information may increase their demonstrability. In this experiment, individuals (N = 60) and 6-person groups (N = 360) generated estimations with or without frames of reference. We hypothesized that estimations involving frames of reference would be best fit by models predicting intra-group influence based on the accuracy of alternatives or of members in general. Conversely, we hypothesized that estimations not involving frames of reference would be best fit by models predicting influence based on member extroversion or proposal centrality. Results indicate that groups outperformed individuals and that estimations generated in the presence of frames of reference were superior to those generated in their absence. Accuracy and expertise schemes provided the best fit when frames of reference were provided, whereas an extroversion scheme provided the best fit when they were not.
Original Publication Citation
Bonner, B.L., Sillito, S.D., & Baumann, M.R. (2007). Collective estimation: Accuracy, expertise, and extroversion as sources of intra-group influence. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 103, 121-133.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Bonner, Bryan L.; Walker, Sheli Sillito; and Baumann, Michael R., "Collective Estimation: Accuracy, Expertise, and Extroversion as Sources of Intra-Group Influence" (2007). Faculty Publications. 8891.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8891
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2007
Publisher
Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/