Keywords

fieldwork, comparison, self-actualization, interaction, nature

Abstract

Fieldwork, an experiential and outdoor component of a traditional lecture class, has been effective in improving students’ content knowledge and attitudes. However, most studies of these courses use a full lecture course as the comparison group rather than comparing amounts or types of fieldwork. This study compares two classes that incorporate fieldwork (n = 18 and 12 participants, respectively) and uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze changes in content knowledge, self-efficacy, and perceived value of the subject (entomology). Pre-and post-test scores suggest that information memorization is best taught in a traditional classroom environment. Qualitative data illustrate that the most meaningful parts of the intensive field study course are regular interaction, curriculum flexibility, and a constant connection with nature. Thus, the data suggest that more intensive field study leads to self-actualization, learning from others, ecological awareness, and flexible thinking.

Original Publication Citation

Fine, L., Peterson, T., Duerden, M. D., Nelson, R., & Bennion, J. (2016). The function of field study: Comparison of limited and full field experience courses. Research in Outdoor Education 14(1), 86-106.

Document Type

Peer-Reviewed Article

Publication Date

2016

Publisher

Research in Outdoor Education

Language

English

College

Marriott School of Business

Department

Experience Design and Management

University Standing at Time of Publication

Associate Professor

Download

Share

COinS