Patient Familiarity with, Understanding of, and Preferences for Clinical Trial Endpoints and Terminology
Keywords
clinical trial, endpoints, breast cancer, quality of life, outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, comprehension
Abstract
Background: While there is increased attention to designing and explaining clinical trials in ways that are clinically meaningful for patients, there is limited information on patient preferences, understanding and perceptions of this content.
Methods: Using maximum difference scaling (MaxDiff) methodology, we developed a survey assessing understanding of 19 clinical terms and perceived importance of nine endpoint surrogate phrases employed in clinical trials and consent forms. The survey was administered electronically to individuals with metastatic breast cancer affiliated with the Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance. Analysis was performed using the “bayesm” package in the R Statistical Package.
Results: Among 503 respondents, 77% had a college degree, 70% were diagnosed with metastatic disease ≥2 years prior to survey completion, and 77% had received ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. Less than 35% of respondents reported understanding “fairly well” the terms “symptomatic progression,” “duration of disease control,” “time to treatment cessation,” and “endpoints.” Income level and time since onset of metastatic disease correlated with comprehension. Patients who had received six or more lines of therapy perceived “time until serious side effects” (P< 0.001) and “time on therapy” (P< 0.001) to be more important compared to patients who had received one line of therapy. Positively phrased parameters were associated with increased perceived importance.
Conclusions: Even among educated, heavily pre-treated patients, many commonly used clinical research terms are poorly understood. Comprehension and perceived importance of trial endpoints varies over the course of disease. These observations may inform the design, discussion, and reporting of clinical trials.
Original Publication Citation
Mitchell S. von Itzstein, Elda Railey, Mary L. Smith, Carol B. White, George W. Sledge Jr., John R. Howell, Wendy Lawton, Donna M. Marinucci, Nisha Unni, and David E. Gerber, "Patient familiarity with, understanding of, and preferences for clinical trial endpoints and terminology", Cancer, 2020.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Von Itzstein, Mitchell S.; Railey, Elda; Smith, Mary L.; White, Carol B.; Sledge, George W. Jr.; Howell, John R.; Lawton, Wendy; Marinucci, Donna M.; Unni, Nisha; and Gerber, David E., "Patient Familiarity with, Understanding of, and Preferences for Clinical Trial Endpoints and Terminology" (2020). Faculty Publications. 8530.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8530
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2020
Publisher
Cancer
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Marketing
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/