Keywords
short interest, analyst recommendations, fundamental analysis, arbitrage
Abstract
We investigate whether short sellers and analysts differ in their use of information that is predictive of future returns. We find that open short interest is significantly associated in the expected direction with all eleven variables examined. In contrast, analysts tend to positively recommend stocks with high growth, high accruals, and low book-to-market ratios, despite these variables having a negative association with future returns. We then investigate the profitability of using short interest in trading. We find abnormal returns (1.11 percent per month) from a zero-investment strategy that (1) shorts firms with highly favorable analyst recommendations (buy signal) but high short interest (sell signal), and (2) buys firms with highly unfavorable analyst recommendations (sell signal) but low short interest (buy signal). Short interest, therefore, appears to capture predictive information that can be used by investors in trading against analysts’ recommendations to increase returns.
Original Publication Citation
Drake, Michael S. and Rees, Lynn L. and Swanson, Edward P., Should Investors Follow the Prophets or the Bears? Evidence on the Use of Public Information by Analysts and Short Sellers. The Accounting Review 86 (1), 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1269427 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1269427
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Drake, Michael S.; Rees, Lynn; and Swanson, Edward P., "Should Investors Follow the Prophets or the Bears? Evidence on the Use of Public Information by Analysts and Short Sellers" (2011). Faculty Publications. 8402.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8402
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2011
Publisher
The Accounting Review
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Accountancy
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/