Keywords
disclosure perceptions, financial reporting complexity, standard-setting challenges
Abstract
We survey a broad group of professionals who use financial statements as part of their job to assess the extent to which they believe financial reports suffer from disclosure overload. Consistent with the claims made by regulators, auditors, and preparers, we find that a significant portion of professional financial statement users believe disclosure overload is a problem. However, this group is in the minority, with about twice as many professional users believing that overload is not a problem and that more information should be disclosed in financial statements. This dichotomy presents a difficult challenge to standard setters aiming to improve financial reporting by altering the amount of information provided in financial reports. To that end, we complement existing research on the informativeness of accounting information by measuring perceptions of the usefulness of the various financial statements and their footnotes across a variety of tasks. Finally, we develop a framework that could be useful in developing a theory of disclosure overload.
Original Publication Citation
Drake, M.S., Hales, J. and Rees, L. (2019), Disclosure Overload? A Professional User Perspective on the Usefulness of General Purpose Financial Statements†. Contemp Account Res, 36: 1935-1965. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12488
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Drake, Michael S.; Hales, Jeffrey; and Rees, Lynn, "Disclosure Overload? A Professional User Perspective on the Usefulness of General Purpose Financial Statements*" (2019). Faculty Publications. 8386.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8386
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2019
Publisher
Contemporary Accounting Research
Language
English
College
Marriott School of Business
Department
Accountancy
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/