Keywords
information choice, litigation risk, confidence, experience, judgment impact
Abstract
Previous research finds that individuals place more weight on information when they choose to obtain it than when they acquire it without explicit choice. We examine whether litigation risk and auditor experience influence auditors’ susceptibility to this information choice effect. In our experiment, auditor participants evaluate the likelihood of an inventory obsolescence issue for a hypothetical client subsidiary. We find that in a high litigation risk setting, less-experienced auditors weight information they choose to acquire more heavily than do less-experienced auditors who acquire the same information without choice. Further, we predict and find that auditors choosing to acquire information are more confident in their judgments than auditors who acquire the same information without choice. Interestingly, the effect of choice on confidence is exacerbated by experience, and is especially pronounced when litigation risk is high. Our study contributes to the auditing, management, and psychology literatures on information choice, with practical and theoretical implications for judgment and decision-making in accounting settings.
Original Publication Citation
Smith, S. D., W. B. Tayler, and D. F. Prawitt. 2016. The effect of information choice on auditors’ judgments and confidence. Accounting Horizons 30(3):393-408.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Smith, Steven D.; Tayler, William B.; and Prawitt, Douglas F., "The Effect of Information Choice on Auditors’ Judgments and Confidence" (2015). Faculty Publications. 8212.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8212
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2015
Publisher
Accounting Horizons 30
Language
English
College
David O. McKay School of Education
Department
Accountancy
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/