Keywords
controls, conformity, social norms, crowding out, public goods
Abstract
Research in behavioral economics suggests that in addition to their traditional incentive effects, formal control systems can influence psychological motivations. We extend this literature by demonstrating experimentally that formal controls directly influence people’s sense of what behaviors are appropriate in the setting (personal norms), and indirectly alter people’s tendency to conform to the behavior of those around them (descriptive norms). These effects persist even after the controls are changed, so that the effects of current controls can be strongly influenced by past control strength. Our results support those who are incorporating psychological factors into principal-agent models (such as Fischer and Huddart [2008]), and suggest that those models should be further modified to incorporate correlations between personal norms and conformity to descriptive norms.
Original Publication Citation
Tayler, W. B., and R. J. Bloomfield. 2011. Norms, conformity, and controls. Journal of Accounting Research 49(3):753-790.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Tayler, William B. and Bloomfield, Robert J., "Norms, Conformity, and Controls" (2010). Faculty Publications. 8207.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/8207
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2010
Publisher
Journal of Accounting Research
Language
English
College
David O. McKay School of Education
Department
Accountancy
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/