Keywords

balanced scorecard, motivated reasoning, causal chain, business strategy, measure selection, strategic performance measurement system

Abstract

This paper uses an experiment to examine whether involvement in scorecard implementation can mitigate the effects of motivated reasoning that occur when the scorecard is framed as a causal chain rather than merely as a balanced set of measures. Psychological research on motivated reasoning suggests that managers will evaluate and interpret data in ways consistent with their preferences, increasing their tendency to arrive at conclusions that are consistent with their desired conclusions (Kunda 1990). Consistent with that research, results of my study show that managers who are involved in selecting strategic initiatives perceive those initiatives as having been more successful than managers who are not involved in the initiative selection process (holding constant actual scorecard performance). Results further suggest that simply framing the scorecard as a causal chain is not sufficient to mitigate these effects. However, results show that framing the scorecard as a causal chain, in conjunction with involving managers in the selection of scorecard measures, mitigates the effects of motivated reasoning tied to manager involvement in initiative selection.

Original Publication Citation

Tayler, W. B. 2010. The balanced scorecard as a strategy evaluation tool: The effects of responsibility and causal-chain focus. The Accounting Review 85(3):1095-1117.

Document Type

Peer-Reviewed Article

Publication Date

2009

Publisher

The Accounting Review

Language

English

College

David O. McKay School of Education

Department

Accountancy

University Standing at Time of Publication

Full Professor

Download

Included in

Accounting Commons

Share

COinS