Spoilers, blocking coalitions, and the core
Keywords
core allocations, coalition, economy
Abstract
This paper surveys non-cooperative implementations of the core which tell an intuitive story of coalition formation. Under the core solution concept, if a blocking coalition exists those agents abandon the current allocation without regard for the consequences to players outside the blocking coalition. Yet in certain circumstances, these players have an incentive to prevent formation of any blocking coalition; a game analyzed in Lagunoff (Games Econ Behav 7:54–61, 1994) is vulnerable to such circumstances. To obtain all core allocations and only core allocations, a mechanism must either restrict the actions of non-members of a proposed coalition, or ensure that non-members are unharmed by the departure of the coalition. These requirements illustrate the core’s nonchalance toward agents not in blocking coalitions.
Original Publication Citation
“Spoilers, Blocking Coalitions, and the Core,” by Brennan Platt. Social Choice and Welfare. 33:361-381, September 2009.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Platt, Brennan C., "Spoilers, blocking coalitions, and the core" (2009). Faculty Publications. 5792.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/5792
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2009-9
Publisher
Social Choice and Welfare
Language
English
College
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Department
Economics
Copyright Status
© Springer-Verlag 2009
Copyright Use Information
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/