Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work
Keywords
history, little things, medicine, nurses, nursing, ontology, physicians, work
Abstract
This historical study aims to refine understanding of the nature of nursing work. The study focuses on the 1880 crisis at Guy's Hospital in London to examine the nature and meaning of nursing work, particularly the concept of nursing work as many ‘little things.’ In this paper, an examination of Margaret Lonsdale's writing offers an original contribution to our understanding of the ways in which nursing work differs from medical practice. In this way, we use the late‐nineteenth‐century controversy at Guy's Hospital as a prism through which to examine the contested nature of nursing work. Lonsdale's ideas are corroborated by examination of writings by nurse leaders Florence Nightingale and Eva Luckes. Luckes, in particular, elaborated what was meant by nursing as the performance of a thousand little things, which are specific to nursing work. While physicians had been performing much of what was considered to be nursing work, nurses developed some of these and other interventions into a unique body of work characterized by meticulous attention to significant details. Some implications regarding current nursing practice are discussed.
Original Publication Citation
Tesseyman, S, Hallett, C, Brooks, J. Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work. Nursing Inquiry. 2017; 00:e12203.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Tesseyman, Sheri; Hallett, Christine; and Brooks, Jane, "Crisis at Guy's Hospital (1880) and the nature of nursing work" (2017). Faculty Publications. 5332.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/5332
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2017-05-23
Permanent URL
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/8066
Publisher
Nursing Inquiry
Language
English
College
Nursing
Copyright Status
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/