Perspectives on Engagement Barriers and Alternative Delivery Formats from Non-completers of a Community-Run Parenting Program
Keywords
Engagement, Interventions, Parent training, Internet delivery, Attrition
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to learn about barriers to participation faced by families who had signed up for but not completed a community-based parenting program that was not part of a research project. We also sought to gauge interest in alternative, web-based methods of delivering a parent training intervention. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 27 parents who had signed up for but not completed a community-based parenting program. Results indicated that practical reasons such as scheduling were the most common barrier faced by parents. Results also suggested substantial interest in alternative web-based and hybrid models of program delivery. Hybrid models would allow participants to move between face-to-face small group classes and web-based classes; allowing for easy make-up of missed small-group sessions. Interventions designed by community organizations and researchers should consider using alternative methods, including hybrid models, of program delivery in order to reach a larger number of individuals.
Original Publication Citation
Duppong-Hurley, K., Hoffman, S., Barnes, B., & Oats, R. (2016). Perspectives on engagement barriers and alternative delivery formats from non-completers of a community-run parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(2), 545-552
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Dupopng-Hurley, Kristin; Hoffman, Steven; Barnes, Bridget; and Oats, Robert, "Perspectives on Engagement Barriers and Alternative Delivery Formats from Non-completers of a Community-Run Parenting Program" (2016). Faculty Publications. 2948.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/2948
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2016-2
Permanent URL
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/5762
Publisher
Journal of Child and Family Studies
Language
English
College
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Department
Social Work
Copyright Status
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015