Keywords
regional economic development, European Union, FDI, Economic Growth, regional development programs, lagging regions
Abstract
Regional development in the Chinese provinces and in the regions of the EU countries are evaluated and compared. Development efforts in southern Italy, northeast England and eastern Germany are reviewed along with EU, Community-wide regional development programs. Equity concerns suggest promotion of regional policy, but the pursuit of maximum national economic growth would avoid it, since it sacrifices some economic growth. The impact of FDI and domestic investments on individual Chinese provinces is compared with their impact in Europe. There is an implicit contrast between public sector regional development programs and more effective private foreign direct investments.
Original Publication Citation
Phillip J. Bryson and Keren Sun, ""Provincial Development in China: Lessons from EU Regional Policy Experience,"" Global Economic Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, September 27, pp. 193-215. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1.18/12265871561935
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Bryson, Phillip J. and Sun, Keren, "Provincial Development in China: Lessons from EU Regional Policy Experience" (2007). Faculty Publications. 239.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/239
Document Type
Peer-Reviewed Article
Publication Date
2007-09-01
Permanent URL
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/2812
Publisher
Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group
Language
English
College
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Department
Economics
Copyright Status
© 2007 Institute of East and West Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul. This is a pre-print of an article submitted for consideration in the Global Economic Review. Global Economic Review is available online at: www.tandfonline.com
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/