Abstract
Many prospective teachers make assumptions about their students before they actually begin teaching. Many of these assumptions can be rooted specifically in students’ races, cultures, classes, religions, genders, and sexual orientations. In order for prospective mathematics teachers to challenge these biases, some mathematics teacher educators have provided tasks to support these prospective teachers in becoming aware of their own biases. I chose to analyze a group of five prospective mathematics teachers discussing topics of teaching for social justice to examine more closely the kinds of biases they carry, and more specifically, how those biases came about in their conversations. My analysis also involved looking specifically at whether or not these prospective mathematics teachers were challenging their own as well as others’ biases that came out during the discussions. The results of this study display the ways in which these biases were illuminated during the group discussions as well as the lack of prospective teachers challenging the biases that came out.
Degree
MA
College and Department
Physical and Mathematical Sciences; Mathematics Education
Rights
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Ross, Amy Saunders, "“Don’t Say Gay. We Say Dumb or Stupid”: Queering ProspectiveMathematics Teachers’ Discussions" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 7587.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7587
Date Submitted
2019-08-01
Document Type
Thesis
Handle
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/etd10927
Keywords
queer theory, racism, sexism, homophobia, mathematics education, prospective teachers, group discussion
Language
english