Abstract
This thesis examines the context in which Advanced Placement (AP) English policies are made, examining the political and economic realities that impact policy decisions as well as the discipline-based critiques of the AP English program which have led many writing program administrators (WPAs) and faculty to question existing credit and placement policies. Recent efforts to dramatically expand the AP program have left many questioning whether the AP English experience actually fulfills the promises suggested by the program. After reviewing current literature relating to AP English, this thesis examines the findings of an empirical study conducted at BYU. The study evaluates the outcomes of AP English based on student writing in an actual college setting, focusing on the predictive validity of AP exam scores. Conclusions are drawn from the findings of the study and the review of literature. Recommendations are made for evaluating and designing AP policies that respond sensitively and fairly to all the stakeholders while encouraging WPAs and interested faculty to actively define the role of AP English within the college curriculum.
Degree
MA
College and Department
Humanities; English
Rights
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Gonzalez, Jennifer Dawn, "Advanced Placement English and the College Curriculum: Evaluating and Contextualizing Policy" (2004). Theses and Dissertations. 215.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/215
Date Submitted
2004-07-16
Document Type
Thesis
Handle
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/etd508
Keywords
Advanced Placement, AP, English, composition, writing, writing program administration, educational policy, education reform, K-16, high school/college articulation, credit by examination, credit hours, curricular coherence, college composition
Language
English