Abstract
Romanization is a common, yet sometimes controversial, tool used to make Korean and Japanese more accessible to beginning learners, but its effects on orthographic processing and phoneme discrimination ability are not well understood. The participants consisted of 34 university students (21 female, 13 male; mean age = 20.97) enrolled in 100- and 200-level Korean and Japanese courses at Brigham Young University. Using a quasi-experimental, counterbalanced design, participants completed phonological judgement tasks in three orthographies per language while accuracy, reaction time, and cortical activation were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS); post-task surveys contextualized learner responses. Orthography significantly affected accuracy in Japanese, F(2, 48) = 10.69, p < .001, ηp² = .31, and Korean, F(2, 48) = 4.50, p = .016, ηp² = .16, with Modified Hepburn (94%) and Revised Romanization (88%) yielding the highest accuracy. Reaction time differed by orthography in Japanese, F(2, 48) = 12.27, p < .001, ηp² = .34, but not in Korean, where course level predicted reaction time, F(1, 49) = 12.87, p < .001, ηp² = .21. Romanized orthographies primarily engaged the left inferior parietal lobule and left precentral gyrus, whereas native scripts recruited additional temporal, frontal, and visual regions. These findings indicate that orthographic familiarity and proficiency shape behavioral performance and neural processing, with implications for script sequencing in Korean and Japanese instruction.
Degree
MA
College and Department
Humanities; Center for Language Studies
Rights
https://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Chipman, Kyle Thayne, "Neural Processing of Japanese and Korean Phonological Items in Romanized Versus Native Writing Systems" (2026). Theses and Dissertations. 11362.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/11362
Date Submitted
2026-06-26
Document Type
Thesis
Permanent Link
https://arks.lib.byu.edu/ark:/34234/q26737ec96
Keywords
Japanese, Korean, language processing, neurolinguistics, second language learning
Language
english