Degree Name
BS
Department
Economics
College
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Defense Date
2026-03-05
Publication Date
2026-03-16
First Faculty Advisor
Brian Boyer
First Faculty Reader
Riley Wilson
Honors Coordinator
Joseph Price
Keywords
Corporate Disclosure, Information Asymmetry, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Financial Reporting Timeliness, Regression Discontinuity Design, Firm Valuation
Abstract
Does faster financial reporting increase firm value? I exploit the $700 million public float threshold in SEC Rule 12b-2, which imposes a 60-day Form 10-K filing deadline for large accelerated filers relative to 75 days for accelerated filers. Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design, I show that crossing the threshold sharply increases the likelihood of Large Accelerated Filer status and reduces filing lags by approximately one week, with no evidence of concurrent changes in mandated audit quality. Despite this exogenous acceleration in information disclosure, I fail to reject the null hypothesis that there are no effects on firm valuation (Tobin’s Q), the implied cost of debt, or audit fees. These estimates are accompanied by large standard errors, limiting their precision. The results suggest that we cannot conclude that capital markets meaningfully price a marginal 15-day reduction in reporting lag into asset values or debt contracting terms.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Mumford, Bryson, "THE IRRELEVANCE OF FILING SPEED: EVIDENCE FROM A REGULATORY REPORTING DISCONTINUITY" (2026). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 492.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/492