Title
Evidence of Opinion: A Critical Analysis of the Use of Empirical Literature in Controversial Topics
Files
Download Full Text (233 KB)
Keywords
Poster ID #332
Abstract
The American Psychological Association (APA) and the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) use the same empirical sources as supporting evidence for differing views on the psychological treatment of sexual minorities. Given this discrepancy, we undertook a critical analysis of all sources commonly cited by APA and NARTH. We conclude that the sources have not been used consistently, and that this may be a product of differing beliefs surrounding a controversial issue.
Description
The Annual Mary Lou Fulton Mentored Research Conference showcases some of the best student research from the College of Family, Home, and Social Sciences. The mentored learning program encourages undergraduate students to participate in hands-on and practical research under the direction of a faculty member. Students create these posters as an aide in presenting the results of their research to the public, faculty, and their peers.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Erekson, David; Mondragon, Sasha; DeLange, Kiley; and Leetham, Amelia, "Evidence of Opinion: A Critical Analysis of the Use of Empirical Literature in Controversial Topics" (2010). FHSS Mentored Research Conference. 49.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/fhssconference_studentpub/49
Publication Date
2010-04-01
Permanent URL
http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/2234
Language
English
College
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Department
Psychology
Copyright Status
© 2010, David Erekson, et al.;
Copyright Use Information
http://lib.byu.edu/about/copyright/