Bridging the Clinician/Researcher Gap with Systemic Research: The Case for Process Research, Dyadic, and Sequential Analysis
Marriage and Family Therapy, process research, dyadic data analysis, sequential analysis
In Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), as in many clinical disciplines, concern surfaces about the clinician/researcher gap. This gap includes a lack of accessible, practical research for clinicians. MFT clinical research often borrows from the medical tradition of randomized control trials, which typically use linear methods, or follow procedures distanced from “real‐world” therapy. We review traditional research methods and their use in MFT and propose increased use of methods that are more systemic in nature and more applicable to MFTs: process research, dyadic data analysis, and sequential analysis. We will review current research employing these methods, as well as suggestions and directions for further research.
Original Publication Citation
Oka, M. & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Bridging the clinician-researcher gap with systemic research: The case for process research, dyadic, and sequential analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 17-27. . doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00339.x
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Oka, Megan and Whiting, Jason B. PhD, "Bridging the Clinician/Researcher Gap with Systemic Research: The Case for Process Research, Dyadic, and Sequential Analysis" (2012). Faculty Publications. 2136.
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Family, Home, and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1999-2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved
Copyright Use Information