Keywords
James Lucas, Urim and Thummim, historians
Abstract
James Lucas had the opportunity to respond to the review of the book that he and Jonathan Neville wrote, By Means of the Urim & Thummim. He elected not to really respond to the issues I brought up but rather summarized his essential points. That doesn’t leave much to respond to. However, there is a continuing misunderstanding of how historians work that I feel must be underscored.
Recommended Citation
Gardner, Brant A.
(2025)
"Responding to a Non-Responsive Response,"
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Vol. 64, Article 9.
Available at:
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/interpreter/vol64/iss1/9
