Keywords
Urim and Thummim, Joseph Smith translation, Lucas and Neville defense
Abstract
In By Means of the Urim & Thummim, James Lucas and Jonathan Neville valiantly seek to defend Joseph Smith’s role as the divinely inspired translator, a role that they argue is incompatible with using any tool other than the Nephite “intepreters,” later called the Urim and Thummim. They offer a unique theory to account for the statements of witnesses about Joseph using a seer stone in a hat, arguing that it was a fake demonstration using memorized passages to satisfy onlooker curiosity about the translation process. They propose a translation model in which Joseph did more than just get impressions, but saw an incomplete or literal translation in the Urim and Thummim that left plenty of room for heavy mental effort to turn what he saw into acceptable English. While the authors seek to defend Joseph from what they view as the questionable theories of modern Church scholars, their misunderstanding and misinterpretation of both the historical record and scripture result in some errant assumptions and logical gaps that undermine their well-intentioned work.
Recommended Citation
Lindsay, Jeff
(2025)
"Through a Glass Darkly: Restoring Translation to the Restoration?,"
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Vol. 63, Article 12.
Available at:
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/interpreter/vol63/iss1/12
