Keywords
Book of Mormon contextualization, biblical scholarship, interpretive tension
Abstract
Because Grant Hardy’s important book deliberately contextualizes the Book of Mormon in light of “the generally agreed upon findings of modern biblical scholars and historians,” it invites further discussion on points in which the Book of Mormon and other significant biblical scholars and historians challenge those findings. Hardy also declares that his commentary “is consistently focused on the plain meaning of the text,” which is understandably appealing, but which is in tension with Joseph Smith’s foundational observation that “the different teachers of the religion understood the same passages of scripture so differently as to destroy all confidence in settling the question by an appeal to the Bible.” I argue on several key issues that a different contextualization can radically change meaning.
Recommended Citation
Christensen, Kevin
(2024)
"Nurture and Harvest: A Continued Conversation with The Annotated Book of Mormon,"
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Vol. 62, Article 8.
Available at:
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/interpreter/vol62/iss1/8
