Identifying design values across countries through adaptive comparative judgment
adaptive comparative judgement, design and technology, technology education, design assessment, international design
Adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) has proven to be a valid, reliable, and feasible method for assessing student performance in open-ended design scenarios. In addition to the use of ACJ for purely assessment and evaluation, research has demonstrated an opportunity to identify the design values of judges involved with the ACJ process. The potential for ACJ, as a tool for understanding cultural design values, and potentially facilitating international collaboration, is intriguing. Therefore, this study established three panels of judges, from countries around the world, to assess one body of student work using the ACJ method. The similarities, differences, and findings from these assessment results were analyzed, revealing distinct design values, preferences, and differences for each group of judges from the different locations.
Original Publication Citation
Bartholomew, S. R., Yoshikawa, E., Hartell, E., & Strimel, G. J. (2019). Identifying Design Values across Countries through Adaptive Comparative Judgment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Bartholomew, Scott Ronald; Ruesch, Emily Yoshikawa; Hartell, Eva; and Strimel, Greg J., "Identifying design values across countries through adaptive comparative judgment" (2019). Faculty Publications. 5558.
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Copyright Use Information