BYU Studies Quarterly
Keywords
BYU Studies, First Vision, Mormonism, conference proceedings
Abstract
Professor James B. Allen, distinguished scholar of Joseph Smith’s First Vision accounts, wrote the following in a 2012 article: “The writing of Mormon history has only begun. As in the case of other institutions and movements, there is still room in Mormonism for fresh historical scholarship. . . . What is needed, simply, is the sympathetic historian who can approach his tradition with scholarship as well as faith and who will make fresh appraisal of the development of the Mormon mind.”1 The purpose of this presentation is to provide such a “fresh appraisal” of Joseph Smith’s 1820 theophany, less perhaps in terms of the vision itself and more with what I am calling the “reclamation of revelation,” or the rediscovery of what it taught and why it became so meaningful to Latter-day Saints over time. I will also attempt to show that the First Vision was actually a part of a series of visions and that the vision of Moroni overshadowed it in importance for almost one hundred years.
Recommended Citation
Bennett, Richard E.
(2020)
"Not the First but the Second,"
BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 59:
Iss.
2, Article 12.
Available at:
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol59/iss2/12