formant, kinematic, diphthong, articulation
First and second formant histories have been used in studies of both normal and disordered speech to indirectly measure the activity of the vocal tract. The purpose of the present study was to determine the extent to which formant measures are reflective of lingual movements during diphthong production. Twenty native speakers of American English from the western United States produced four diphthongs in a sentence context while tongue movement was measured with a magnetic tracking system. Correlations were computed between the vertical tongue movements and the first formant, as well as between the anteroposterior movements and the second formant during the transition phase of the diphthong. In many instances the acoustic measures were clearly reflective of the kinematic data. However, there were also exceptions, where the acoustic and kinematic records were not congruent. These instances were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively in an effort to understand the cause of the discrepancy. Factors such as coarticulation, motor equivalence (including the influence of structures other than the tongue), and nonlinearities in the linkage between movement and acoustics could account for these findings. Recognizing potential influences on the acoustic-kinematic relationship may be valuable in the interpretation of articulatory acoustic data on the individual speaker level.
Original Publication Citation
Dromey, C., Jang, G-O, & Hollis, K. (2013) Assessing correlations between lingual movements and formants. Speech Communication, 55, 315-328.
BYU ScholarsArchive Citation
Dromey, Christopher; Jang, Gwi-Ok; and Hollis, Kristi, "Assessing Correlations Between Lingual Movements and Formants" (2013). All Faculty Publications. 1787.
David O. McKay School of Education
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is the author's submitted version of this article. The definitive version can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2012.09.001
Copyright Use Information